Perubahan Politik dan Sosial Budaya Masyarakat Gampong Aceh Di Era Internet–New Media

Umaimah Wahid

Abstract


The Acehnese political communication starts from Gampong and embraces all individual inclusively. The political processes and the Gampong governance (village) in Aceh are held in meunasah which is a learning and community center of the Acehnese society. The research utilizes a constructivism paradigm that is to try to understand, explain and interpret meanings and ongoing social interactions. The governance of the Acehnese society is the first-level governance proven effective in advancing the Acehnese society. The political communicators like kechiek, imeum and tuhapeut govern based on fixed job descriptions without overlapping and violating each other. Internet technology as new media having character provides a new thing for the processing, transmission, reception and response as well as the interactive nature between users of new media audiences and it gives implication in media management change paradigm and the effect of community/audience. The system and structure is a form of the local treasure in which the Acehnese society is developed. Internet causing political and social change in the culture of the gampong.


Keywords


Socio-political charge, Local wisdom of acehness-gampong, Internet-new media

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin. (2003). Ilmu Komunikasi. Jakarta: Raja Drafindo Persada.

Baran, Stanley J. (2012). Mass Communication Theory; Foundations, Ferment, and Future. Belmon, CA : Thomson.

Bennett, W. L., & Shanto Iyengar. (2008). A New Era of Minim al Effects? The Changing Fou ndation s of Political Communication. Journal of Communication. Vol. 58. pp. 707–731.

Christen, C. T., & Gunther, A. C. (2003). The influence of mass media and other culprits on the projection of personal opinion. Communication Research. Vol. 30, pp. 414-431.

Dahlgren, P. (2001). The public sphere and the net: Structure, space and communication. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 33–55). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Delli Carpini, M. X. (2000). In search of the informed citizen: What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Communication Review Vol.4, pp. 129-164.

Entman, R. M., & Herbst, S. (2001). Reframing public opinion as we have known it. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp.203–225). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

Graber, Doris A. (2005). Political Communication Faces the 21st Century. Journal of Communication.pp. 479-507.

Groat, L. and Wang. (2002). Architectural Research Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Guba and Lincoln. (1994) Handbooks of Qualitative Research, Sage Publication, London.

Habermas, Jurgen. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research Communication Theory. Vol. 6, pp. 411-426.

Kurniawan. Andri. (2012). Tugas dan Fungsi Kechiek dan Tuha Peut Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Gampong Lampisang Kecamatan Peukan Banda Aceh Besar Berdasarkan Qanun Nomor 8 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintahan Gampong. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 10 No. 3.

Livingstone, Sonia. (1999). New media, new audiences? New media and Society, Vol.1, No 1, pp. 59-66

McQuail, Denis. (2010). Teori Komunikasi Massa. Edisi 6. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Humanika.

Mosco, V., & Foster, D. (2001). Cyberspace and the end of politics. Journal of Communication Inquiry. Vol. 25, pp. 218–236.

Nimmo, Dan (2004). Komunikasi Politik. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Rahn, W. M., & Rudolph, T. J. (2001). National identities and the future of democracy. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy. (pp. 453–467) Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

Shah, Dhavan V., Nojin Kwak, and R. Lance Holbert. (2001). “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication. Vol. 18, pp. 141–162.

Sparks C. (2001). The Internet and the global sphere. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 75–95). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

Stanley, Phiona. (2013). A Critical Ethnography of ‘Westerners’ Teaching English in China. New York: Routledge.

Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

Wahid, Umaimah. (2012). Komunikasi Politik, Perkembangan Teori dan Praktek. Bekasi: Widya Media Komunikasi.

Wignjodipuro, Surojo (1979). Pengantar dan Azas-azas Hukum Adat. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/jc.v1i1.33

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Communicate is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.