Konflik Perbatasan Indonesia-Malaysia Dalam Forum Komunitas Online Dan Perspektif Masyarakat Di Wilayah Perbatasan

Irwansyah Irwansyah

Abstract


The boundary conflict of Indonesia and Malaysia always related with the differences in perceptions, understanding and responses. Therefore, by using the concept of communicate conflict from Krauss and Morella, this study analyzes the new media and social media-based online discussion forums to find the border issue which often becomes discourse. By using nethnography, texts discourse that causes differences in perception, understanding, and construction is analyzed and then compared with the findings of the actual state of border areas with ethnographic methods. Combined nethnographic and ethnographic methods in collecting, processing, analyzing and discussing the data potential conflict border areas of Indonesia and Malaysia are expected to find and decipher the Indonesia-Malaysia conflict truth. This research shows that online discussion forum users do not understand the context of boundary, while the local community shows that the harmonization of interaction and communication. Conflict in the online community forum is an extension Indonesia-Malaysia bilateral conflict has actually been completed.


Keywords


boundary conflict, online communities, ethnography, netnography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayoko, O. B. (2007). Communication Opennes, Conflict Events and Reaction to Conflict in Culturally Diverse Workgroups. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 105-124.

Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Bowler Jr, G. M. (2010). Netnography: A method specifically designed to study cultures and communities online. The Qualitative Report, 15(5), 1270-1275.

Burhani, R. (2008, October 21). Malaysian territorial violations in Ambalat draw strong criticism. diperoleh dari http://www.antaranews.com/view/?i=1224602835&c=NAS&s=

Donnan, H., & Wilson, T. (1999). Borders: Frontiers of Identity, Nation and State. Berg: Oxford International Publisher Ltd.

Fetterman, D. M. (2010). Ethnography: Step-by-step. Singapore: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Fitriani, E. (2012). Evolusi Hubungan Indonesia-Malaysia. In E. Fitriani, Hubungan Indonesia-Malaysia dalam perspektif sosial, budaya, negara, dan media: Kasus perbatasan dan pekerja migran (pp. 11-66). Jakarta: UI-Press.

Fluri, P. P., & Buchanan, A. (2006). Why Democratic States have Dedicated Border Management Services The Necessity for a Specialised, Professionally Trained Border Guard. In A. Batara G., & B. Sukadis, Border Management Reform: In Transition Democracies (p. 3). Jakarta: DCAF & LESPERSSI.

Heider, K. G. (2001). Seeing anthropology: Cultural anthropology through film. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Herdiani, G. N. (2012). Dinamika persenjataan Indonesia dan Malaysia: Studi tentang peningkatan kapabilitas militer Indonesia berkaitan dengan konflik Ambalat (2006-2010). (Master’s thesis) Retrieved from: lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20307797-T31119-Dinamika%20persenjataan.pdf

Internet World Stat. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The Field Behind the Screen : Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 61.

Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage

Krauss, R. M., & Morsella, E. (2001). Communication and conflict. In M. Deutsch, & P. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of constructive conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 131-143). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lestari, D. (2013, October 24). Masalah perbatasan Indonesia-Malaysia selesai 2016. Antara News. Retrieved from http://www.antaranews.com

Lumenta, D. (2012). Membingkar paradoks epistemologi negara tentang perbatasan. In E. Fitriani, Hubungan Indonesia-Malaysia dalam perspektif sosial, budaya, negara dan media: Kasus perbatasan dan pekerja migran (pp. 149-160). Jakarta: UI-Press.

Olaniran, B. A. (2010). Group Communication and Conflict Management in an Electronic Medium. International Journal of Conflict Management, 21(1), 44-69.

Phillipson, Robert. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shariff, S. Z., Aziz, H. A., Yusof, N., & Thaheer, B. A. (2012). An Analysis on ASEAN Print Media Coverage: A Case Study on the phenomenon of strife between Malaysia and Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(23), 100-112.

Shin, J. & Cameron, G. (2003). The potential of online media: A coorientational analysis of conflict between PR professionals and journalists in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 583-602.

Website Traffic Estimation. (2013). Retrieved from http://topix.com.websitetrafficspy.com/

Wolcott, H. F. Ethnography: A way of seeing: Lanham: Rowman Altamira.

Wood, J. T. (2010). Interpersonal communication: Everyday encounters. Boston: Wadsworth




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/jc.v1i2.40

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Communicate is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.