Kondisi Pendahulu dan Gejala Groupthink dalam Dinamika Komunikasi Politik

Lisa Adhrianti


Groupthink phenomenon in the context of political communication in the scope of the legislative group in the Indonesian parliament where members of multipar pol heteroge11eous background, but often resulted in cont roversial decisions
and unpopular. The paradigm of this research is postpositivis with a qualitative
approach. Methods used in this research is a case study. In general, this study
cm firmed that groupthink occurs in tire dynamics of political communication in the legislatiPe drnft law K I P group WL1rking Committee of Representatives Commission I 011 a process t:f discussion a11d decision-making of public bodies. Tlzere are se<'eral Ct JJ t dititms predecessor (antecedent) which prod uces some symptoms of grouptlti11k hallmark t{t!ze Indonesian parliament, namel y that the cohesion of the group is not /1ased on the fear factor or the reluctance of the figure of leaders in ilze group, lnt t lwcnuse of the presu re (:f time for completion
of tasks, fatigue and co1 (lict of intereM s <uith the group executive, which then
forces the legislatiPe group to produce n decision that can not be said to be either through a compromise measure tlta t succeeded in presenti11g a new article, namel!tl.J, 15, and 16 in tile drntt laze KIP :!OOS .

Full Text:




Adler, Ronald B., George Rodma. (1985). Understand­ ing H uman Co111mwtication. Second Editio11. New York: H olt, Rinehart & Winston.

.-11 ison, Graham. (l999 ).Esst:llce t f Oecisioil : [xpftwzill the Cu/Ja/l ,I issile Crisis, 2nd Edition. ;le' York: Longman (google ebook)

.-rdana, Komang, dkk. (2009). Perilaku Kt11":tlilzsasiall.

Yogyak.lrta: Craha Tlmu.

.-ritin, rn"•ar. (2011). J.:.mnunikasi Politik. Yugyakart,l: Cr<1h,1 llmu.

BelmonJohnson, Da•id V & Frank P. johnson. (2012).

Oilza111iktt Kelo111pok: Teori da11 Ki!terampilmz. 9th ed . Jakarta: PT lndekst, USA : TI1omson Wad­ sworth.

Biro Arsip dan Dokumentasi DPR RL (2008). Proses Pembahasan Rancangan Undang-U ndang Tentang Kebebasan Memperoleh Informasi Publik : Brcku

-7. Jakarta : Sekretariat Jenderal Dewan Per­


Jurnal Communicate Volume 2 No.1 Juli 2016

Biro Humas dan Pemberitaan, (2014). Selayang Pan­ dang Mekanisme Kerja dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. Jakarta : Sekretaris Jenderal DPRRI.

Denzin, N.K. dan Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). Handbook < f Qualitative Research. Second Edition. London: SAGE Publications.

Eddi Wibowo dkk. (2004). Ilmu Politik Kontemporer.

Yogyakarta: YPAPI.

Efriza. (20140. Studi Parlemen : Sejarah, Konsep, dan

Lanskap Politik Indonesia. Malang : Setara Press.

Forsyth, D.R.. (1999). Group Dynamics. California: Brook/Cole Publishing Company.

Janis. I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (2nd ed). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/jc.v2i1.71

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Communicate is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.