The Shifting of Burden of Proof on Corruption Offences in Indonesia After The Ratification of United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003
Abstract
This article describes the result of a research regarding the shifting of burden of proof on corrup- tion offenses in the Indonesia after the ratification of United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003. T he article uses normative research which regulation, conceptual, case and compar- ative approach. Such research emphasizes interpretation and legal construction to obtain some legal norms, conception, regulation list and its implementation in concerto cases. Regulation and concep- tual approach to used how to know, existences, consistency and harmonization regarding the shifting of burden of proof upon corruption offenses in legislation body. The cases approach uses comparative law regarding the reversal burden of proof upon corruption offender between Indonesia and the other countries. This research shows that the shifting of burden of proof has never yet applied for in the corruption cases Indonesia. The Indonesian corruption regulation policy, especially article 12B, 37, 37A, 38B apparently it’s not cleaq and disharmony to norm of sudden charge of fortune the shifting of burden of proof formulation in connection with United Nations Convention Against Corruption 2003 (KAK 2003). So, necessary (needs) of modification sudden charge of fortune shifting of burden of proof formulation which preventive, represive and restorative characteristic.
Keywords: Corruption; The Shifting of Burden of Proof; Balanced Probability of Principles
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barda Nawawi Arief. 2007. Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Bandung: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Bernard Arief Sidharta. 1999. Refleksi Tentang Hukum. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Romli Atmasasmita. 2002. Korupsi, Good Governance Dan Komisi Anti Korupsi Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Badan Pembinaaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman dan HAM RI.
Hong Kong Legal Information Institute melalui http://www.hklii.org/cgihklii.org/disp.pl/hk/ jud/en/hkca/1997/CACC000722%5f1995.ht ml?queryz%7e+hui+kin+ hong didown load pada tanggal 15 Januari 2007
In The Supreme Court of The Republic of Vanuatu, Election Petition No. 31 of 1998 melalui Vanuatu: Taranban http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2004/15.html di down load pada tanggal 7 Februari 2007
Lilik Mulyadi. 2012. Hukum Pidana Umum dan Khusus, Bandung: PT Alumni.
Mudzakkir. 2001. Posisi Hukum Korban Kejahatan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Disertasi, Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Nihal Jayawickrama, Jeremy Pope and Oliver Stolpe, “Legal Provisions to Facilitate the Gathering of Evidence in Corruption Cases: Easing the Burden of Proof”, Forum on Crime and Society, Vol. 2, No. 1, Desember 2002
Rahardjo, Satjipto. 2000. Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Speville, Bertrand de, Reversing the Onus of Proof: Is It Compatible with Respect for Human Rights Norms, The Papers, 8th International Anti-Corruption Conference, di down load melalui http://ww1.transparency.org/iacc/8th_iacc/p apers/despeville.html di do wn load pada tanggal 23 Desember 2006
Stolpe, Oliver, 2003. Meeting the burden of proof in corruption-related legal proceedings, unpublished
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/salj.v2i1.77
Copyright (c) 2018 The Southeast Asia Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Southeast Asia Law Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.