Pemidanaan Terhadap Profesi Notaris Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Perlindungan Hukum

Syafran S., Fauzi Yusuf Hasibuan, Irhamsyah Irhamsyah


This research intends to examine the problematic of criminalization against the Notary profession in Indonesia. To analyze this problem, the researcher employs the theory of legal protection as Grand Theory, profession and professionalism theory as Middle-Range Theory, and criminalization theory as Applied Theory. The method employed in this research is juridical-normative method. The results of this study show the following conclusions. Firstly, criminalization against notary can only be carried out if it fulfills three conditions, namely the Notary violates the procedure of drawing up authentic deeds as regulated in UUJN (Law on Notary Profession), the notary violates the provisions of the criminal law as regulated in the Criminal Code, and the existence of the mens rea from the notary concerned. In making an official (ambtelijk) deed (drawn up by a notary), the Notary may be held liable for criminal liability for the material truth of the deed he made and can be determined as a perpetrator or accomplice of a criminal act. However, in the drafting of a party (partij) deed (drawn up before a notary), a notary may only be held liable for criminal liability for the formal aspects of the deed he made and can only be stipulated as an accomplish to a criminal act. Secondly, a more appropriate criminal justice model to be applied in the settlement of criminal cases involving the Notary in carrying out his duties and authority as a public official is a mediation of restorative justice-based penalty. In this model, sanctions are applied to perpetrators of crime not in the form of corporal punishment, imprisonment or confinement, but the obligation to provide compensation or restitution to victims of crime.

Full Text:



Abdul Bari Azed. (Sept-Okt, 2004). “Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris: Pembaharuan Bidang Kenotariatan.” Media Notariat.

Abdulkadir Muhammad. (1992). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Bagir Manan. (2007). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia dalam UU No. 4 Tahun 2004. Yogyakarta: FH UII.

C.F.G. Sunaryati Hartono. (1994). Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia Pada Akhir Abad Ke-20. Bandung: Alumni

Charles N. Faerber. (1998). “Being There: The Importance of Physical Presence to the Notary.” John Marshall Law Review 31.

Enid Campbell (1996). Legal Research. Sydney: The Law Book Company Ltd.

Habib Adjie. ()kt, 2009). “Aktualisasi Jabatan Notaris Pasca Lima Tahun Berlakunya Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN).” Kuliah Umum Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum UGM. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum UGM.

Hanif Dzaki and Lathifah Hanim. (2018). “Legal Protection to the Public Notary in Providing Information Before the Investigation.” Jurnal Akta 5:2.

Indiana Secretary of State. (2018). Indiana Notary Public Guide. Indiana: Indiana Secretary of State.

Iowa Secretary of State. (1999). Pocketbook for Iowa Notaries Public. Iowa: Iowa Secretary of State,

John, Edward Mills. (1951). John's American notary and Commissioner of deeds manual : The general and statutory requirements of these offices pertaining to acknowledgments, affidavits, oaths, depositions and protests, with forms. edition by Frederick H. Campbell. Chicago: Callaghan & Company.

Kuntjoro Purbopranoto. (1985). Beberapa Catatan Hukum Tata Pemerintahan dan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Bandung: Alumni.

Lotulung, Paulus Effendi. (Apr, 2002). “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum dalam Menjalankan Tugasnya.” Media Notariat.

Michael L. Closen dan R. Jason Richards. (1997). “Notaries Public Lost in Cyberspace, or Key Business Professionalsof The Future?.” John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law 15:4.

Michael L. Closen (1997). Notary Law & Practice: Cases & Materials, National Notary Association. CA: Chatsworth.

Montana Secretary of State. (2019). Montana Notary Public Handbook. Montana: Montana Secretary of State.

Muhammad Affandi Nawawi. (2006). Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum Berdasarkan UUJN Nomor 30 Tahun 2004. Jakarta: Mitra Media.

P. Ramanatha Aiyar. (2007). Concise Law Dictionary. New Delhi: Wadhwa Nagpur.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media

Philipus M. Hadjon. (Sept-Des, 1997). “Tentang Wewenang.” Yuridika 5:6.

Pieter E. Latumeten. (2006). Perlindungan Jaminan Hukum Bagi Profesi Notaris. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2009 Tentang Bendera, Bahasa, dan Lambang Negara, Serta Lagu Kebangsaan.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Richard B. Humphrey. (1948). The American Notary Manual, Fourth Edition. Dallas: R.B. Humprey.

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro. (1994). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

SF. Marbun. (1997). Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administrasi di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Soetandyo Wignjosoebroto. (2002). Hukum, Paradigma Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya. Jakarta: Elsam dan Huma.

Tobing, G.H.S. Lumban. (1983). Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Jakarta: Erlangga.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Nuansa Kenotariatan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.