The Legal Policy of Corporation Legal Standing as Rechtpersoon at Indonesian Criminal Justice System
Abstract
Feature of corporation as activities-oriented for profit can lead to potential violations law or corporate crime. The criminal action corporations can arised because the impact of corporate activities arising from business contracts, product quality problems, failure of information technology systems and negligence of the administrative requirements for business licensing compliance. In other words, the legal entity of crime was often referred as corporate crime as violations committed by businesses to profit more quickly and maintains the company's reputation. The study concluded, first, the political dimension of the criminal law on corporation has general nature, that political criminal law founded in Criminal Code Bill which are oriented to the development of law by placing the corporation as a criminal, and need a codification law of Corporation. Second, The political criminal law also has special nature, which is found in 16 laws examined, in the contexts of criminal responsibility concepts and application of pattern of criminalas well as models of criminal sanctions can be imposed on perpetrators of criminal acts of the corporation.
Keywords: Corporate crime of law politics, legal standing, subject crime of law.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Reference
, N. U. (1945). Naskah UUD. Adi setyadi dan Rena Yulia. (2010). Hukum Pidana Ekonomi. (G. Ilmu, Ed.) Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Graha Ilmu. Arifin. (2005).
Peran Akuntan dalam menegakan prinsip GCG pada perusahaan di indonesia. Universitas Diponegoro, (p. 8). Semarang. asic.gov.au. (2016, February 16). asshidiqie, J. (2008).
Pokok Hukum Tata negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi (Vol. 2). Jakarta: PT. Bhuana Ilmu Populer. Attamimi, M. F. (2005).
Ilmu hukum dan perundang-undangan (Vol. 1). Jakarta, Indonesia: UI. Bakhri, S. (2009).
Hukum pembuktian dalam praktik peradilan pidana . Yogyakarta: Total Media. Black law Dictionary. (n.d.). BUMN.go.id. (2016, February 9). Retrieved from www.bumn.go.id Definition of alter ego. (2016, February 16). Retrieved from Uslegal.com. KUHP 389. KUHP 398. KUHP 399. KUHP 789. M, T. (n.d.).
Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif. In Theodorus. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesua. Naskah akademik ruu hukum acara pidana. (2008). Retrieved from wordpress.com. NKRI, N. U. (1945).
Naskah UUD NKRI. Priyatno, M. d. (2010).
Pertanggung jawaban pidana korporasi. Jakarta: Fajar pratama offset. Quinney. (n.d.). Persekongkolan jahat Perusahaan. Reksodiputro, M. (1993).
Tindak pidana korporasi dan pertanggungjawabannya perubahan wajah pelaku kejahatan di Indonesia. Dies natalis kepolisian ke 47. Jakarta. Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. Theodorus. (2007).
Akuntasi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif. Jakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Indonesia. (1993).
Tindak Pidana Korporasi dan Pertanggungjawabanya perubahan wajah pelaku kejahatan di Indonesia. Jakarta. Undang Undang no 3 (Transfer dana dalam pasal 87 menentukan lain bahwa jika tindak pidana sebagaimana dimaksud dalam pasal 80 sampai dengan 85 dilakukan oleh korporasi pertanggung jawaban pidana dikenakan terhadap korporasi dan pengurusnya 2011).
Undang Undang No 40 tengang perseroan terbatas. (2007). Undang undang no 6 tahun 2011. Undang Undang tentang transfer dana, 3 (2011).
Wiyono. (n.d.). Pembahasan Undang Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Yeager, M. B. (1980). Corporate Crime. New York: The free press
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/salj.v2i1.67
Copyright (c) 2018 The Southeast Asia Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Southeast Asia Law Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.