Flexibility Protection of Copyright in Indonesia

Dijan Widijowati


Information technology developments with various functions of application has become public needs on performing activities of daily life. Information technology development and duplication have a positive contribution to human civilization in modern times, but has given distortion of copyright protection in Indonesia. Establishment Copyright Act No. 28 of 2014 is expected to provide protection originators without extinguish of information technology. Normative juridical approach used in this research to described descriptive analytical assessment phase which focuses on the assessment of secondary data. Data was collected with literature study to support the object assessment. The results showed that Copyright Act No. 28 of 2014, not be able to restrict application functions of user as protection for originators. Surveillance, prevention and control of information technology user and duplication should be done in an integrated manner with involvement of businesses and third parties who have the technological ability to control digital devices in the process of duplication.


Copyright, information technology, originators

Full Text:



Civil Code.

Act No. 28 of 2014.

Bonelli, L. (2014). Low-tech security: Files, notes, and memos as technologies of anticipation. Security Dialogue. Vol. 45 No. 5, pp. 476–493.

Cotterrell, R. (2006). Law, culture and society: Legal ideas in the mirror of social theory. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Damian, E. (2002). Hukum Hak Cipta. PT. Bandung: Alumni.

Fisk, N. W. (2011). Digital Piracy. New York: Chelsea House.

Fitzgerald, B., Shi, S. X., Foong, C., and Pappalardo, K. (2015). Country of origin and internet publication: Applying the Berne Convention in the digital age. In B. Fitzgerald and J. Gilchris (Eds.). Copyright Perspectives Past, Present and Prospect. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 29–50.

Gautama, S. (1977). Hukum merek Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Alumni.

Hadfield, G. K. and Weingast, B. R. (2012). What is law? A coordination model of the characteristics of legal order. Journal of Legal Analysis. Vol . 4 No. 2, pp. 471–514.

Information and Electronic Transactions Act, No. 11 of 2008.

Koops, B. (2011). The Evolution of privacy law and policy in the Netherlands. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 165–179.

Larsson, S. (2014). Karl Renner and (intellectual) property—how cognitive theory can enrich a sociolegal analysis of contemporary copyright. Law & Society Review. Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 3–33.

Malagi, S. (2016). The role of international framework in promoting copyright protection in cyber space. Research Journal Science and Technology. Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 107–112.

Mándi, A. (2003). Protection and challenge of pharmaceutical patents. Journal of Generic Medicines. Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 72–82.

May, C., and Sell, S. K. (2005). Intellectual property rights: A critical history. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publisher.

Meese, J. (2015). User production and law reform: A socio-legal critique of user creativity. Media, Culture & Society, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 1–15.

Menell, P. S. (1989). An analysis of the scope of copyright protection for application programs. Stanford Law Review. Vol. 41 No. 5, pp. 1045–1104.

Milanese, C. (2016). Lights, camera, legal action: Assessing the question of acting performance copyrights through the lens of comparative law. Notre Dame Law Review. Vol. 91 No. 4, pp. 1641–1674.

Postigo, H. (2012). The digital rights movement: The role of technology in subverting digital copyright. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

Samuelson, P. (1999). Implications of the agreement on trade related aspects of intellectual property rights for cultural dimensions of national copyright laws? Journal of Cultural Economics. Vol. 23 No. 1: 95–107.

Sardjono, A. (2004). Pengetahuan tradisional: Studi mengenai perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual atas obat-obatan. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana FH UI.

Yu, P. K. (2016). Five decades of intellectual property and global development. WIPO Journal, Vol. 8. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com.

Yusuf, E. (2000). Penataran dan lokakarya gugus HaKI. Jakarta: Departemen Kehakiman dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI, Dirjen Hak Kekayaan Intelektual

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/salj.v1i2.7

Copyright (c) 2017 The Southeast Asia Law Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
The Southeast Asia Law Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.