Determining Criminal Actions in Corruption: The characteristics of Freies Ermessen Principles
Abstract
The government is required to solve the dynamics of the problem quickly and precisely by deciding a policy even though it has no legal framework (freies ermessen). The implementation of freies ermessen in practice is often used as the basis of alleged corruption by Corruption Eradication Commission (CEC/KPK). The method used in the assessment is the normative juridical approach with literature approach. The implementation of freies ermessen has the risk of success and failure that could harm the state, but Corruption Eradication Commission should be able to consider the failure of the policy is part of the business in freies ermessen.
Keywords: Corruption Eradication Commission , criminal act, freies ermessen.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aji, oemar seno. (1980). Peradilan Bebas Negara Hukum. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Amirudin. (2010). Korupsi Dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Arief, B. N. (2007). Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Atmasasmita, R. (2006). Indonesia Pasca Konvensi PBB Menentang Korupsi.
Averroes, D. A. (2012). Freies Ermessen.
Campbell, H. B. (1979). Black’s Law Dictionary (Fifth). St. Paul, Minn West Publishing.
Djaja, E. (2012). Pemberantasan Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum. CIVIS, II(2), 2.
Friedman, L. M. (1977). Law and Society An Introduction. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
Marbun, S. F. (2011). Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia (III). FH UII Press, Yogyakarta.
Suny, I. (1981). Mekanisme Demokrasi Pancasila. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/salj.v2i1.75
Copyright (c) 2018 The Southeast Asia Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Southeast Asia Law Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.