Supervisory Function on Judges: Prevent Corruption Context
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to determined the effectiveness of the supervision of the Supreme Court judges in Indonesia. Supervision the code of ethics and code of conduct of judges can be seen from the number of public complaints on judges are immoral and detention of judges by the Corruption Eradication Commission. The method used in this research was normative legal research/normative juridical, the data were analyzed descriptively qualitative. The research founded that The Supreme Court’s role in the framework of the supervision of judges has not been effective. This research suggested that judges should have high integrity, visionary, and also understanding for law and social sciences, and also should have the intellectual character, thus judges feel protected by the presence of the Supreme Court.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alkostar, A. (2013). Hukum pidana Indonesia perkembangan dan pembangunan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Argandona, A. (2007). The United Nations Convention against corruption and its impact on international companies. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 74 No. 4, pp. 481–496.
Atmasasmita, R. (2012). Teori hukum integratif, rekonstruksi terhadap teori hukum pembangunan dan teori hukum progresif. Yogyakarata: Genta Publishing.
Azhary, M. T. (1992). Negara hukum. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
Brett, A. (2015). Later scholastic philosophy of law. In F. D. Miller Jr., and C. Biondi (Eds.). A treatise of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence: Volume 6: A history of the philosophy of law from the ancient Greeks to the scholastics, pp. 111–131. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
Butt, S. (2011). Corruption and law in Indonesia. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Caldwell, P. C. (2005). Controversies over Carl Schmitt: A review of recent literature. The Journal of Modern History. Vol. 77 No. 2, pp. 357–387.
Dunleavy, P., and Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management. Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 9–16.
Fischer, C. (2016). The reception of Magna Carta in early modern Germany, c. 1650–1800. The Journal of Legal History. Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 249–268.
Gagarin, M., and Woodruff, P. (2015). Early Greek legal thought. In F. D. Miller Jr., and C. Biondi (Eds.). A treatise of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence: Volume 6: A history of the philosophy of law from the ancient Greeks to the scholastics, pp. 7–33. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
Gultom, B. M. (2012). Pandangan kritis seorang hakim dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia.
Gupta, A. (1995). Blurred boundaries: The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist. Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 375–402.
Henderson, J. V., and Kuncoro, A. (2004). Corruption in Indonesia. NBER Working Paper. No. 10674, pp. 1–36.
Hidayat, U. (2015). Negara hukum dan politik hukum Islam di Indonesia: Catatan kritis atas pemikiran Nurcholish Madjid. Asy-Syari‘ah. Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 261–276.
Horowitz, D. L. (1994). The Qur'an and the common law: Islamic law reform and the theory of legal change. The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 233–293.
Jayawickrama, N. (2002). Developing a concept of judicial accountability—The judicial integrity group and The Bangalore principles of judicial conduct. Commonwealth Law Bulletin. Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 1091–1108.
Jeddawa, M. (2011). Negara hukum good governance dan korupsi di daerah. Yogjakarta: Total Media.
King, D. Y. (2000). Corruption in Indonesia: A curable cancer? Journal of International Affairs. Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 603–624.
Kusumohamidjojo, B. (2004). Filsafat hukum: Problematika ketertiban yang adil. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. (2006). Konsep-konsep hukum dalam pembangunan. Bandung: Alumni.
Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., and Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 659–688.
Lindsey, Tim. (2004). Legal Infrastructure and Governance Reform in Post-Crisis Asia: The case of Indonesia. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature. Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 12–40.
Lindsey, T. (2006). Law reform in developing and transitional states. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Long, R. T. (2015). Hellenistic philosophers of law. In F. D. Miller Jr., and C. Biondi (Eds.). A treatise of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence: Volume 6: A history of the philosophy of law from the ancient Greeks to the scholastics, pp. 111–131. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
Lopa, Baharuddin. (1997). Masalah korupsi dan pemecahannya. Jakarta: Kipas Putih Aksara.
Miller Jr., F. D., and Biondi, C. (2015). Aristotle’s philosophy of Law. In F. D. Miller Jr., and C. Biondi (Eds.). A treatise of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence: Volume 6: A history of the philosophy of law from the ancient Greeks to the scholastics, pp. 79–109. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
Witanto, D. Y., and Negara, A. P. (2013). Diskresi hakim sebuah instrumen menegakkan keadilan substantif dalam perkara-perkara pidana. Bandung: Afabeta.
Marjit, S., and Shi, H. (1998). On controlling crime with corrupt officials. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 163–172.
Momčilović, O., Ðurić, A., and Kadarjan, D. (2011). Crime and motivation towards corruption as a result of countries in transition: A case study of Serbia. SEER: Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 101–109.
Mulcahy, L. (2011). Legal architecture: Justice, due process and the place of law. Oxon: UK: Taylor & Francis.
O’Keefe, R. (2004). Universal jurisdiction: Clarifying the basic concept. Journal of International Criminal Justice. Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 735–760.
Pies, I., Beckmann, M., and and Hielscher, S. (2014). The political role of the business firm: An ordonomic concept of corporate citizenship developed in comparison with the Aristotelian idea of individual citizenship. Business & Society. Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 226–259.
Posner, R. A. (1993). What do judges and justices maximize? (The same thing everybody else does). Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1–41.
Robertson-Snape, F. (1999). Corruption, collusion and nepotism in Indonesia. Third World Quality. Vol. 20 No. 3, pp 589–602.
Rukmini, Mien. (2007). Perlindungan HAM melalui asas praduga tidak bersalah dan asas persamaan kedudukan dalam hukum pada sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.
Sherlock, S. (2002). Combating corruption in Indonesia? The Ombudsman and the assets auditing commission. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies. Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 367–83.
Smith, R. (2014). Textbook on international human rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sunggono, B. (2001). Metodelogi penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sunindhia, Y.W. (1996). Praktek penyelenggaraan pemerintahan di daerah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Timming, A. R. (2015). The 'reach'of employee participation in decision‐making: Exploring the Aristotelian roots of workplace democracy. Human Resource Management Journal. Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 382–396.
Tutik, T. T. (2006). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.
Usfunan, Y. (2009). Bunga rampai refleksi satu tahun komisi yudisial. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial RI.
Vinx, L. (2015). The guardian of the constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Waluyo, B. (2002). Penelitian hukum dalam praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Yunas, D. N. (1992). Konsepsi negara hukum. Padang: Angkasa Raya.
Book IV on Guidelines for Environmental Monitoring at the Institute of Justice Chapter I Article 1 (3) of the Act of 1945 of the Fourth Amendment is ratified on August 10, 2002.
Judicial Commission of Indonesia Regulation Number 03 of 2013 concerning the Grand Design Capacity Judge
Joint Decree of the Chairman of the Supreme Court by the Judicial Commission Chairman No. 047/ KMA/ SKB / IV / 2009 and No. 02 / SKB.P.KY / 2009 of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges.
The fourth paragraph of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/salj.v1i2.14
Copyright (c) 2017 The Southeast Asia Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Southeast Asia Law Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.