Relationship of The Military Prosecutor General And The Attorney General in The Prosecution Function
Abstract
Law enforcement is a process to translate the wishes of the law into reality. The law enforcement process will culminate in the implementation of laws and regulations by the law enforcement officers themselves. Law enforcement agents in the Indonesian public criminal justice system include: Police, Prosecutors, Judges, Lawyers, and Penitentiaries. Meanwhile, law enforcement agents in the Indonesian armed forces criminal justice system include: Military Judges, Military Prosecutors, Military Police, Military Defense Attorneys, and Military Penitentiaries. Elucidation of Article 57 of Law Number 31 of 1997 stipulates that the Military Prosecutor General in performing prosecution function shall be responsible to the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia as the highest public prosecution service in the State of the Republic of Indonesia through the Commander-in-Chief, while in performing duties to develop the Military Prosecution Service, shall be responsible to the Commander-in-Chief. Although the Law Number 31 of 1997 has governed the relationship between the Military Prosecutor General and the Attorney General in performing their duties in technical prosecution function, but in the practice, those duties have not been performed as mandated by a statutory law.
Keyword: Law Enforcement in Prosecution Function
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Indonesian Constitution and Constitutionalism,. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Asshiddique, J. (2015). Reinforcement of Governmental and Judicial System. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Atmosudirdjo, P. (1981). Administrarive Law. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Brouwer, J. G., & Schilder. (1998). A Survey of Dutch Administrative Law. Nijmegen: Ars Aeguilibri.
Budiarjo, M. (1998). Fundamentals of Political Science. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hamzah, A. (2003). Independence and Freedom of Judicial Powers, a Paper Presented at the National Law Development Seminar VIII, BPHN. Denpasar: Ministry of Justice and Human Right RI.
HR, R. (2008). State Administrative Law. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
M. Friedman, L. (1975). The Legal System; A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
M. Hadjon, P. (1998). Regarding Government Competence (Bestuurbevoegdheid). Pro Justisia Number XVI.
Manan, B. (2003). Theory and Politics of Constitution. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, Yogyakarta.
Marinka, J. S. (2017). Reform of Public Prosecution Service in National Legal System. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Nn. (2016). The National Law Development Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights RI, Relations Inter-State Institutions in The 1945 Constitution RI. Jakarta.
Setiadi, E. and K. (2017). Integrated Criminal Justice System and Law Enforcement System in Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Sinamo, N. (2016). Science of Legislation. Jakarta: Jala Permata Aksara.
Soekanto,Soerjono and Sri Mamuji, S. (1979). Role and Use of Library in Legal Research, Center for Legal Documentation. Jakarta: Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia.
Sumapermata, A. M. (2007). Military Court Procedural Law. Bandung: Alumni Press.
Syarifudin, A. (2000). Heading to Clean and Accountable Government Administration. Bandung: Universitas Parahyangan.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/salj.v2i1.76
Copyright (c) 2018 The Southeast Asia Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Southeast Asia Law Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.